COGNITIVE FACETS OF AFFECTIONATE COMMUNICATION IN THE ENGLISH AND UZBEK LINGUISTIC WORLD PICTURE
Keywords:
affectionate communication, endearment, warmth, closeness, empathy, intimacy, politeness, pampering, conceptualize and react to the situation, maintain social harmony, make cross-cultural interactions smoother.Abstract
This article explores the linguocognitive dimensions of affectionate communication, demonstrating how concepts such as endearment, pampering, closeness, politeness, empathy, and warmth are conveyed through various linguistic forms, both morphologically and lexically, as well as at the sentence level. Analysed examples show linguocognitive and pragmatic peculiarities of this linguistic phenomenon in the English and Uzbek cultures.
References
Alimova M.Kh. Pragmatic approach to the analysis of connotative meaning in the English and Uzbek languages. Central Asian Journal of Education. 2021, vol.6, issue 1.
Alimova M.Kh. Some peculiarities of expressing connotative meaning in the English and Uzbek languages. The European Journal of Literature and Linguistics. Premier Publishing.SRO.2019. №2
Austin J. L. How to Do Things with Words. Oxford University Press, 1962
Bailey B. Language socialization and language acquisition. In P. P. S. Wong (Ed.), Handbook of language and ethnic identity. Oxford University Press, 2000.
Bloomfield L. Language. Chicago University Press, 1933.
Brown P., and Levinson S. C. Politeness: Some Universals in Language Usage. Cambridge University Press, 1987.
Dillard J. P., Solomon, D. H., and Palmer M. T. Relational Framing Theory. Communication Research. 1996.
Fraser B. What are discourse markers? Journal of Pragmatics. 1999.
Lakoff G., and Johnson M. Metaphors We Live By. University of Chicago Press, 1980.
Wierzbicka A. Emotions across languages and cultures: diversity and universals. Cambridge University Press. 1999.
