DIPLOMACY BY DESIGN: KNIFE HERITAGE AS CULTURAL AND ECONOMIC STATECRAFT.

This is an outdated version published on 2025-09-22. Read the most recent version.

“BLUE BLADE” COMPANY, CRAFTSMAN DIPLOMACY BY DESIGN: KNIFE HERITAGE AS CULTURAL AND ECONOMIC STATECRAFT.

Authors

  • Zukhriddinov Shukhratbek Salohidin ugli

Keywords:

cultural diplomacy; creative economy; geographical indications; evaluation; synthetic control; difference-in-differences; Central Asia.

Abstract

This article investigates whether—and how—heritage knife craft can function as cultural and economic statecraft in Central Asia. Building on historical linkages along the Silk Roads, we conceptualize knives (pichoq/pchak) as portable “knowledge objects” whose forms, motifs, and maker marks travel with people, fairs, and museums. We assemble a program typology (joint exhibitions, city twinning, master–apprentice exchanges, cross-border fairs, and geographical-indication branding) and propose an identification strategy that pairs mixed-methods case studies with quasi-experimental evaluation: difference-in-differences (DiD) and synthetic control. Outcomes include bilateral trade in cutlery categories (HS 8211, 8214) and tourism flows, augmented by cultural memoranda of understanding (MOUs) and media sentiment. A brief policy section distills design principles for “craft diplomacy”: target specific city-pairs with artisanal density, codify standards via GI-style specifications where lawful, and synchronize events with tourism seasonality. The framework yields a replicable way to test whether heritage-led initiatives move the dial on cooperation and commerce—without demanding large budgets or treaty-level negotiations.

References

• Abadie, A., Diamond, A., & Hainmueller, J. (2010). Synthetic control methods for comparative case studies: Estimating the effect of California’s tobacco control program. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 105(490), 493–505.

• Angrist, J. D., & Pischke, J.-S. (2008). Mostly harmless econometrics: An empiricist’s companion. Princeton University Press. (See overview)

• Dirlikov Canales, C. (2021, May 11). The future of cultural diplomacy. Harvard Kennedy School – Initiative for Strategy & International Relations.

• Grincheva, N. (2024). The past and future of cultural diplomacy. International Journal of Cultural Policy.

• LexUZ. (2022, March 3). Law of the Republic of Uzbekistan on geographical indications (ZRU-757).

• Ministry of Justice of Uzbekistan (via Gazeta.uz). (2025, February 6). Samarkand flatbread registered as a geographical indication.

• UN Tourism (UNWTO). (2024, December 20). World Tourism Barometer and Statistical Annex, November 2024.

• UNESCO. (n.d.). Uzbekistan—Silk Roads Program.

• United Nations Comtrade. (n.d.). Global trade data platform.

• United Nations Statistics Division. (2017). HS 8211—Knives; with cutting blades, serrated or not (classification detail).

• Uzbekistan Statistics Agency. (2024). Tourist flows (Jan–Mar 2024).

Downloads

Published

2025-08-01 — Updated on 2025-09-22

Versions

How to Cite

Zukhriddinov Shukhratbek Salohidin ugli. (2025). “BLUE BLADE” COMPANY, CRAFTSMAN DIPLOMACY BY DESIGN: KNIFE HERITAGE AS CULTURAL AND ECONOMIC STATECRAFT. IMRAS, 8(8), 28–32. Retrieved from https://journal.imras.org/index.php/sps/article/view/2491 (Original work published August 1, 2025)

Issue

Section

Articles
Loading...