LINGUOCULTURAL DIMENSIONS IN CLASSIFYING ENGLISH AND UZBEK RIDDLES BY ANSWER TYPE

LINGUOCULTURAL DIMENSIONS IN CLASSIFYING ENGLISH AND UZBEK RIDDLES BY ANSWER TYPE

Authors

  • Abdujabborova Shoxista Adiljanovna PhD in Philology Acting Associate Professor, Department of English Language Practice Andijan State Institute of Foreign Languages Email: abdujabborovashohista645@gmail.com

Keywords:

riddle; answer type; classification; structural analysis; semantic analysis; linguocultural characteristic.

Abstract

The present study explores the linguocultural parameters underlying the categorization of English and Uzbek riddles according to answer type. Drawing on a corpus-based approach, riddles were classified based on the ontological status of their referents (anthropomorphic, zoomorphic, phytomorphic, artifact-related, and natural phenomena). The analysis integrates structural-semantic methodology with comparative linguocultural interpretation.

The results indicate that both linguistic traditions share common cognitive mechanisms, primarily metaphorical conceptualization and analogical mapping, which structure riddle formation. At the same time, typological distinctions emerge in stylistic realization. English riddles display a higher frequency of lexical-semantic play, particularly homonymy and polysemy, whereas Uzbek riddles foreground ethnoculturally marked realia, reflecting agrarian traditions, environmental perception, and everyday material culture.

Thus, the categorization of riddles by answer type reveals both universal cognitive models and culture-specific semiotic encoding, reinforcing the interdependence of language, culture, and conceptualization.

References

Abdujabborova, Shohista A. “Riddles and Their Main Features in English and Uzbek Folk Genres.” European Journal of Literature and Linguistics, no. 4, 2023, – P. 31–39.

Abdurahimov, M. O‘zbek topishmoqlari / Uzbekskie zagadki. Toshkent, 1991.

Britannica, “Riddle.” Encyclopedia Britannica, 21 Mar. 2021, https://www.britannica.com/art/riddle. (18 Okt. 2021 sanasida olindi).

Green, Thomas A., and W. J. Pepicello. The Language of Riddles: New Perspectives. Ohio State University Press, 1984.

Husainova, Zulfiya. O‘ylab top: Topishmoqlar. Toshkent: Fan, 1993.

Jo‘rayev, M. Folklor asoslari. Toshkent: Fan, 2008.

Karasik, V. I. Yazykovaya matrica kultury (Til va madaniyat matritsasi). Moskva: Gnozis, 2013.

Kenges-Maranda, E. “The Logic of Riddles.” Paremiological Collection. Proverb. Riddle (Structure, Meaning, Text), Moskva: Nauka, 1978, – P. 249–282.

Madayev, Ortiq. O‘zbek folklori. Toshkent: Mumtoz so‘z, 2008.

Olaosun, I. E., and J. O. Faleye. “A Cognitive Semantic Study of Some English Riddles and Their Answers in Amidst a Tangled Web.” Asian Journal of Social Sciences & Humanities, vol. 4, no. 2, 2015, – P. 65–71.

Taylor, Archer. English Riddles from Oral Tradition. Berkeley: University of California Press, 1951.

Tolkien, J. R. R. The Hobbit (or There and Back Again). George Allen & Unwin, 1937. (Topishmoq epizodi, 48–51-betlar).

Xudoyev, Samandar S. “O‘zbek topishmoqlarining yaratilish davriga ko‘ra tasniflanishi.” Ilmiy-konferentsiya materiallari, 2022, – P. 34–37.

Yusupova, E. D. “Cognitive Features of English Riddles-Metaphors as Units of Secondary Nomination.” Vestnik Bashkirskogo Universiteta, vol. 13, no. 1, 2008, – P. 127–131.

Downloads

Published

2026-02-01

How to Cite

Abdujabborova Shoxista Adiljanovna. (2026). LINGUOCULTURAL DIMENSIONS IN CLASSIFYING ENGLISH AND UZBEK RIDDLES BY ANSWER TYPE. IMRAS, 9(2), 15–23. Retrieved from https://journal.imras.org/index.php/sps/article/view/2747

Issue

Section

Articles
Loading...