THE PRAGMATIC NATURE OF THE MEANING OF GRADUALISM AND ITS EXPRESSION IN DIFFERENT CONTEXTS

THE PRAGMATIC NATURE OF THE MEANING OF GRADUALISM AND ITS EXPRESSION IN DIFFERENT CONTEXTS

Authors

  • Shaxnoza Sharipova Head teacher, Department of interfaculty English, Karshi State University.

Keywords:

Graduality, Pragmatics, Communicative strategies, Political discourse, English language, Uzbek language.

Abstract

This article explores the pragmatic essence of graduality as a linguistic category that regulates the degree of intensity in communication. It analyzes how graduality functions in everyday speech, political discourse, and academic contexts, focusing on its role in shaping persuasive strategies, mitigating criticism, and enhancing communicative adaptability. Comparative examples from English and Uzbek illustrate the universality of graduality while highlighting language-specific means of expression. The study emphasizes the pragmatic potential of graduality as a tool for social interaction, strategic manipulation, and emotional impact.

References

Lyons, J. (1977). Semantics. Cambridge University Press.

Bolinger, D. (1972). Degree Words. The Hague: Mouton.

Cruse, D. A. (1986). Lexical Semantics. Cambridge University Press.

Kiefer, F. (1987). Pragmatics and Grammar. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.

Бахтин, М. М. (1986). Эстетика словесного творчества. Москва: Искусство.

Хайдаров, А. (2015). O‘zbek tilida graduallik kategoriyasi. Toshkent: Fan.

Fairclough, N. (1992). Discourse and Social Change. Polity Press.

Downloads

Published

2026-06-01

How to Cite

Shaxnoza Sharipova. (2026). THE PRAGMATIC NATURE OF THE MEANING OF GRADUALISM AND ITS EXPRESSION IN DIFFERENT CONTEXTS. IMRAS, 9(6), 27–30. Retrieved from https://journal.imras.org/index.php/sps/article/view/2896

Issue

Section

Articles
Loading...