METHODOLOGICAL FOUNDATIONS OF THE ORGANIZATION OF BALANCED SCORECARD SYSTEM BASED ON THE INTERNATIONAL STANDARDS

This is an outdated version published on 2024-01-01. Read the most recent version.

METHODOLOGICAL FOUNDATIONS OF THE ORGANIZATION OF BALANCED SCORECARD SYSTEM BASED ON THE INTERNATIONAL STANDARDS

Authors

  • Ibrokhimjon U. Tursunaliev

Keywords:

Balanced Scorecard, Strategic Management, Performance Measurement, International Standards.

Abstract

This thesis explores the methodological foundations of organizing the Balanced Scorecard (BSC) system within the context of international standards, examining the intersection of strategic performance measurement and globally recognized benchmarks. The study adopts a mixed-methods approach, integrating theoretical frameworks, case studies, and empirical findings to provide a comprehensive understanding of this complex interplay.

The theoretical framework draws upon key concepts from the BSC, strategic management, and international standards, emphasizing the significance of aligning organizational methodologies with external benchmarks. Case studies exemplify successful strategies employed by organizations in aligning the BSC with standards such as ISO, IFRS, and others, offering practical insights into customization, strategic integration, and organizational learning.

Quantitative findings from a survey of key stakeholders reveal a generally positive perception of alignment levels, accompanied by identified challenges, including terminology discrepancies and resistance to change. Qualitative analysis, derived from semi-structured interviews, delves into the experiences of organizations, highlighting themes of strategic integration, customization, and ongoing learning.

The study contributes to both theory and practice by offering theoretical insights into the nuanced process of aligning the BSC with international standards and providing actionable recommendations for organizations seeking to optimize their performance measurement practices. As organizations navigate the complexities of the global business landscape, this research serves as a guide for fostering transparency, credibility, and strategic clarity on an international scale.

The thesis concludes by emphasizing the evolving nature of the intersection between the BSC and international standards and its implications for strategic management practices. It encourages future research to delve deeper into industry-specific contexts, long-term impacts of alignment, and the role of leadership in driving successful alignment initiatives.

References

Kaplan, R. S., & Norton, D. P. (1992). The balanced scorecard—measures that drive performance. Harvard Business Review,70(1), 71-79.

Kaplan, R. S., & Norton, D. P. (1996). The Balanced Scorecard: Translating Strategy into Action. Harvard Business Press.

Ittner, C. D., & Larcker, D. F. (2003). Coming up short on nonfinancial performance measurement. Harvard Business Press, 81(11), 88-95.

Ferreira, A., & Otley, D. (2009). The design and use of performance management systems: An extended framework for analysis. Management Accounting Research, 20(4), 263-282.

Simons, R. (2000). Performance measurement and control systems for implementing strategy. Prentice Hall.

Zyglidopoulos, S. C. (2002). Standardization and internal organizational communication: Drawing on theories of legitimation. Management Communication Quarterly, 16(1), 26-69.

ISO 9001:2015 - Quality management systems - Requirements.

IFRS 9 - Financial Instruments.

ISO 26000 - Guidance on social responsibility.

ISO 14001 - Environmental management systems - Requirements with guidance for use.

ISO 37001 - Anti-bribery management systems - Requirements with guidance for use.

Lewin, K. (1951). Field theory in social science: Selected theoretical papers. Harper and Row.

Nørreklit, H. (2003). The balanced scorecard: what is the score? A rhetorical analysis of the balanced scorecard. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 28(6), 591-619.

Anderson, S. W. (2014). The balanced scorecard: Adapting Koontz and O'Donnell's principles of management. Management Decision, 52(10), 1929-1935.

Hoque, Z. (2014). 20 years of studies on the balanced scorecard: Trends, accomplishments, gaps and opportunities for future research. The British Accounting review, 46(1), 33-59.

Downloads

Published

2024-01-01

Versions

How to Cite

Ibrokhimjon U. Tursunaliev. (2024). METHODOLOGICAL FOUNDATIONS OF THE ORGANIZATION OF BALANCED SCORECARD SYSTEM BASED ON THE INTERNATIONAL STANDARDS. IMRAS, 7(1), 473–475. Retrieved from https://journal.imras.org/index.php/sps/article/view/907

Issue

Section

Articles
Loading...